It started with a telephone call.
Shortly after Donald Trump’s extraordinary Jan. 2, 2021 conversation with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger went viral, Atlanta-area District Attorney Fani Willis launched a far-reaching criminal investigation into interference in the 2020 election that now stands at a crucial inflection point.
Here is what we know:
Trump lawyers won’t take part: Trump lawyers won’t appear at Georgia hearing where judge will consider release of report
Georgia special grand jury ends probe: Georgia special grand jury wraps up investigation of Trump, allies
While the inquiry started with Trump’s call to Raffensperger, in which the former president urged Georgia’s top election official to “find 11,780 votes” to tilt the 2020 statewide election in his favor, the inquiry has since expanded to include a wide-ranging examination of election fraud.
Specifically, Willis has said authorities have been investigating possible election fraud, conspiracy, oath of office violations, racketeering and election-related violence.
In addition to Guiliani, prosecutors have designated nearly two-dozen others, including a group of Republican electors who falsely certified that Trump had won the election, as potential targets.
What we know: Charging decisions on Trump now loom large in Georgia after grand jury completes its work
The list of grand jury witnesses included current and former public officials, many who have been part of Trump’s inner-circle.
Other prominent witnesses have included Raffensperger and Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, both of whom resisted Trump’s pressure campaign to overturn Biden’s statewide victory.
The Jan. 6 no-shows: Jan. 6 committee never got McCarthy, key Trump aides to testify. Here’s who they are.
Jan. 6 Capitol attack 2 years later: Trump still plagued by multiple investigations
Special grand juries, like the one seated in the election inquiry, do not have authority to make charging decisions. Instead, the panel issues a report and recommendations to the district attorney for action.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney, who disclosed last week that the jury had completed its work and forwarded its report, also indicated the panel had “voted to recommend that its report be published.”
The hearing will determine whether there any objections or other considerations to weigh before taking action.
The hearing could result in the full release of the report and the panel’s recommendations, a partial disclosure or a decision to withhold the document pending any decision on prosecution.
Trump’s Georgia lawyers said Monday that they will not take part in the session.
“To date, we have never been a part of this process,” attorneys Drew Findling and Marissa Goldberg said in a written statement, adding they believed the former president would not be charged.
Meet Fani Willis: The DA who could charge Trump
Willis is not obligated to act on the grand jury’s recommendations. If she does elect to proceed, the prosecutor would likely present a case to one of the county’s two regular grand juries to seek indictments.
The district attorney had expected to make decisions on possible charges before the end of 2022, but a number of legal challenges pressed by key grand jury witnesses pushed late into the year.
A Brookings Institution analysis of the Willis investigation, co-authored by Norm Eisen, a special counsel to the House Judiciary Committee during Trump’s first impeachment, concluded that the inquiry represents perhaps the most serious threat to Trump.
“We conclude that Trump is at substantial risk of criminal prosecution in Fulton County (Georgia),” the report found.
Trump’s legal troubles: ‘Not above the law’: Why Trump’s decision to run for president won’t change his legal woes
It started with a telephone call.